Page 14 - Newcom
P. 14

     PAGE 14
EDITORIAL
SROs need an overhaul, not a merger
   The Canadian Securities Administrators’ (CSA) recently com- pleted consultation on reforming the self-regulatory organization (SRO) framework reveals that a full-scale renovation is needed. Simply forcing the Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada (MFDA) into an arranged marriage with the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) won’t cut it.
While the idea of a merger has merits, there are too few benefits — primarily, cost savings for a small group of dual-platform dealers — to justify the work involved. Corporate mergers are tough enough, but bringing together bureaucratic organizations with disparate histories and cultures is even harder.
Creating IIROC by combining the Investment Dealers Association of Canada with Market Regulation Services Inc. back in 2008 was a monu- mental chore — and their spheres of oversight did not overlap. Merging a pair of rivals that are both engaged in dealer regulation will be much tougher. Most important, a merger will not justify the continued reli- ance on self-regulation.
VICTORIA
B.C. NDP’s gamble pays off
More seats come with more problems as the province tackles financial and environmental challenges
BY BRIAN LEWIS
As much as the investment industry is frustrated with the overpopu- lation of SROs, it’s investors who are being poorly served by the current arrangement. IIROC acknowledged this fact by promising to create an investor panel and to explore improving access to restitution. But the consultation process has shown that much more needs to be done to put investors and the public interest more squarely in the sights of the SROs. Tinkering around the edges isn’t enough.
In any other country, the best solution probably would be to scrap self-regulation altogether and return to direct oversight by statutory authorities. But in Canada, giving up the only shred of national regula- tion seems like a bad bargain too.
What to do, then? Ideally, the CSA would sketch out a vision of opti- mal self-regulation from the ground up and invite the existing SROs to fulfil that vision. However, achieving that would require exceptional leadership from all sides.
While a comprehensive renovation to the SRO system can be accom- plished, an ultimately unsatisfying touch-up is what’s likely in the cards.
     INVESTMENT EXECUTIVE
investmentexecutive.com
EDITORIAL DIRECTOR MELISSA SHIN
SENIOR EDITORS
MARK BURGESS (markb@newcom.ca)
GREG DALGETTY (gregd@)
RESEARCH EDITOR FIONA COLLIE (fiona@) RESEARCH AND SPECIAL PROJECTS EDITOR KATIE KEIR (katie@)
ASSISTANT EDITOR MICHELLE SCHRIVER (michelle@)
SENIOR REPORTERS
JAMES LANGTON (jamesl@)
RUDY MEZZETTA (rudy@)
ART DIRECTOR GIL MARTINEZ
DESIGNER SYLVIE THAUVETTE
CONTRIBUTORS
ANDREW ALLENTUCK, CHARISE ARSCOTT, PATRICIA CHISHOLM, KEVIN DOUGHERTY, MICHAEL GANLEY, LEAH GOLOB, CATHERINE HARRIS, JADE HEMEON, MADDIE JOHNSON, DWARKA LAKHAN, BRIAN LEWIS, RUDY LUUKKO, DONALEE MOULTON, GUILLAUME POULIN-GOYER
DIRECTOR, SALES JULIA SOKOLOVA (julias@) ADVERTISING SALES KATHY LIOTTA, VIVIAN TSE DIRECTOR, CONTENT SOLUTIONS ANNA-CHRISTINA DI LIBERTO
SALES CO-ORDINATOR IRENE PICANCO
Investment Executive is published 12 times a year. Circulation is limited to financial services industry professionals. Visit investmentexecutive.com/subscribe to subscribe. For subscription inquiries, email service@newcom.ca or call 1-844-241-0116.
INVESTMENT EXECUTIVE IS PUBLISHED BY
5353 Dundas St. W., Suite 400, Toronto, ON M9B 6H8 416.614.2200 | 416.614.8861 (fax)
CHAIRMAN AND FOUNDER JIM GLIONNA PRESIDENT JOE GLIONNA
CANADIAN PUBLICATIONS MAIL PRODUCT SALES AGREEMENT NO. 43008019 © 2020 NEWCOM MEDIA INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. MAY NOT BE REPRINTED WITHOUT PERMISSION.
POSTMASTER: PLEASE SEND ADDRESS CHANGES TO:
5353 DUNDAS ST. W, SUITE 400, TORONTO, ON M9B 6H8 ISSN NUMBER: 1202-7405
                                   B.C. Premier John Horgan addresses supporters on election night, Oct. 24.
  the smile on newly re-elected
B.C. Premier John Horgan’s face shows that rolling the dice works best when the dice are already loaded in your favour.
Horgan’s rock-solid majority victory on Oct. 24 came after the incumbent NDP leader took what many saw as a gamble by calling the election a year early — and during the Covid-19 pandemic.
But Horgan wasn’t taking as big a risk as some might have thought.
His previous minority government had turned in a praiseworthy performance while managing Covid-19 and, based on positive poll numbers, he took a calcu- lated risk that many voters would seek stability during a pandemic and stand by the NDP.
And that’s what voters did, in spades — especially in Metro Vancouver, where the previously powerful B.C. Liberals were thrashed.
The NDP captured 57 seats, with one seat under recount at press time. That’s 16
more seats than the party won in 2017. The Liberals, under new leader Andrew Wilkinson, fell by 13 seats to net 28 — their worst showing since 1991. The B.C. Greens, led by new leader Sonia Furstenau, fell to two seats from the three that enabled them to prop up Horgan’s minority gov-
ernment in 2017.
In fact, the NDP prevailed even though
Horgan broke a pact with the Greens not to drop a writ until 2021.
Wilkinson, meanwhile, will resign once the B.C. Liberal party chooses a new leader. The party also will consider a name change. Most important, the Liberals must take a long look at their role as B.C.’s big-tent Liberal-Conservative coalition. Perhaps a shift toward cen- tre-left is warranted?
As the B.C. Liberals look inward, Horgan’s NDP must look outward, because now they’re solely responsible for running the province. Their solid majority presents a free hand, but also significant challenges.
First, a new cabinet is required. Seven former ministers did not run again, including the finance minister. Fortunately, there are fresh backbench- ers to choose from, and three new MLAs — Nathan Cullen, Fin Donnelly and Murray Rankin — are experienced former MPs.
Beyond that, the battle against
Covid-19 continues. Horgan will have to contend with a damaged economy and an estimated $14-billion deficit. He must also confront hefty campaign promises, such as paying eligible families a pandemic benefit of $1,000 each, extending the Skytrain from Surrey to Langley, erecting a new bridge or tunnel across the Fraser River and establishing that still elusive $10/day childcare — all while protecting health care and education.
Another challenge is the partially built Site C hydroelectric dam in northeastern B.C. The public learned in July that there are serious geological weaknesses below the sites for the powerhouse and Peace River diversion tunnels.
During Horgan’s first term, he decided to complete the $12-billion megaproject that the previous Liberal government had launched in 2015. The new geological problems could boost costs to $14 bil- lion or more. Scrapping and reclaiming costs would total about $4 billion. Horgan launched a special study on Site C’s future just before the 2020 election; the report is due in late November or early December.
If Horgan chooses to complete Site C and save thousands of construction jobs, he will alienate the NDP’s powerful environment- alist wing. But scrapping the project would put a serious dent in B.C.’s badly needed economic recovery. IE
  Horgan bet that voters would seek stability during a pandemic
                                         BC NDP







































   12   13   14   15   16